Lender Liability Returns: Sample Cases and Situations

It has been a long, long time since claims of lender liability received any real attention.  Indeed, Mike Baggett co-authored a book in the early '90s on lender liability.  Mike's book was somewhat of a best seller among the tough time for lender crowd (which is tough for me to admit, since I went to Texas and Mike went to Texas A&M and as an former "yell leader" at TAMU, Mike is an "Aggie's Aggie").

Since then, however, the topic has fallen off everyone's radar screen.  The fall off has been this dramatic: the publisher of Baggett's book has NOT updated it since the initial publication, and it is out of circulation.  But to give you a sense of how we see lender liability creeping back into play, below is a short list of where we're dealing with it now.

If nothing else, it will equip you to watch for similar situations—and perhaps get ready.  As always, if you have an example or a question or comment, please post it.

  • Defending National Banking Association in a currently certified class action in the Eastern District of Texas challenging the bank's status as trustee for approximately 220 trusts.  The bank is the latest successor trustee in a series of successor trustees and fiduciary substitutions and appointments dating back to the late 1980s. The class alleges defects in the trusteeship chain of title which purportedly disqualify the defendant bank from serving as trustee. The class seeks to recover all trustee fees paid to the bank and its predecessors, together with appointment of new trustees. Class certification is on appeal to the Fifth Circuit.
     
  • Currently defending REMIC Trust Lender in state court action alleging Special Servicer induced borrower into making property renovations by misrepresenting its intent to extend loan maturity and interfered in borrower's efforts to secure refinancing.
     
  • Secured judgment for Hedge Fund that acted as lender to high-end residential subdivision developer.  Developer contended lender breached promise to lend additional sums to complete subdivision and negligently advised borrower in connection with the development.
     
  • Represented lender against allegations by commercial developer/office building owner that lender had failed to fund multimillion dollar construction loan.
     
  • Representing bank where borrower and guarantor allege failure to fund and credits on guarantee liability in connection with California residential development.
     
  • Represented lender against claims that it and its president had aided and abetted borrower's securities fraud, including borrower's theft of millions of dollars belonging to securities customers.
     
  • Defended lender against counterclaim that it had improperly ceased funding loan.  Lender had sued borrower and guarantor for misappropriating collateral in asset based funding arrangement.
     
  • Defense of National Banking Association in state court against lender liability lawsuits alleging claims for improper loan servicing and wrongful foreclosure. 
     
  • Defended national residential mortgage lender in state court against lender liability actions for wrongful foreclosure.
     
  • Successful jury verdict for National Savings and Loan Association to collect debt owed by borrower on SBA loan.  Borrower counterclaimed that bank had misled it about the profitability of the business to induce the loan. 
     
  • Defended Lender against borrower's claim that bank had refused to refinance or modify construction loan and wrongful foreclosure on partially developed subdivision, including private water utility.
     
  • Defending national bank in Arizona against allegations that one of its workout officers conspired with one of the borrower's officers and other borrower-insiders to steal the borrower (a closely held corporation) from its owners through a negotiated private sale of the borrower's assets. The borrower held inventory, equipment and AR securing the $33M debt.

Co-Lender Mortgage Loan Structures: Understanding the Lender Structure is Critical (Second of Two-Part Series)

This is the second of a two-part series (PART ONE) covering initial due diligence topics for workouts involving co-lender structures, with a focus solely on the participated or syndicated co-lender structure. The series is not a comprehensive listing of possible issues on this topic, but merely a basis template to assist you as you review the co-lender and other relevant loan documents.

Typical Servicing issues:

  • how are on all decisions made within the co-lender group on these subjects?
    • waivers and consents
    • default\enforcement (special servicing issues)
    • after enforcement (expenses to protect\preserve, to sell, to complete; title of the property [name of servicer; tenant in common; nominee entity jointly owned]
    • advances, expenses and losses
    • excess recovery
    • is there a buy\sell provision if co-lenders are not able to resolve disagreement?
  • what decisions may servicer make without input from co-lenders
  • duties of servicer: what must it do (reporting, inspections, etc.)?
  • standard of care of servicer
  • what if servicer has an equity position?
  • rights of co-lenders to examine and copy
  • notification rights (when must servicer notify a co-lender)
  • fees (primary servicing; special servicing; asset management and disposition)
  • future property inspections and reporting (review reports only; or more active role, such as accompany servicer during on-site inspections)

Does the loan seller or originator have any liability?

  • contractual duties and warranties
  • fiduciary duties

Transfers

  • buy\sell for disagreements
  • transfers to affiliates
  • transfers to third parties (right of first offer?)
  • is sub participations\syndication prohibited?

Sharing of payments: on sums paid by the borrower, are payments applied -

  • proportionately to all co-lender?
  • non-proportionately to co-lenders?

If you have any comments, suggestions or additions to the foregoing, please post a comment.

Co-Lender Mortgage Loan Structures: Understanding the Lender Structure is Critical (First of Two-Part Series)

1st in a series of 2 postings

Much of the focus in the media on troubled real estate debt focuses on sophisticated debt structures, or on investors holding bonds in pools of loans. This focus, however, misses an important, intermediate player between these two ends of the barbell: the real estate lender.

In several real estate workouts that I’m handling now, the most difficult discussions are not with the borrower or its lawyer. Instead, the difficulty is within the mortgage lender group itself. Indeed, one distinctive in the current workout environment from the late 80’s is the large number of real estate loans involving multiple lenders holding a portion of the same mortgage loan or lien position.

Now, I’m not describing the situation where one lender has the mortgage lien, a second lender has a lien on the ownership interests in the borrower, and perhaps a third lender has an unsecured loan with the entity owning an interest in the entity owning the borrower.

Instead, I’m describing a single mortgage loan or facility that has been syndicated or participated among multiple real estate lenders. While the multiple or “co-lender” mortgage structure is not new to life insurance company lenders (nor to balance sheet lenders), in the last 15+ years the co-lender mortgage structure became widely used by the broader creditor market; and banks, Wall Street (the investment banks) and mortgage funds joined life companies in “structuring” the first-lien position.

This posting is Part One of a two-part series covering initial due diligence topics for workouts involving co-lender structures, with a focus solely on the participated or syndicated co-lender structure. The series is not a comprehensive listing of possible issues on this topic, but merely a basic template for your use as you read the co-lender agreements and related loan documents.

An understanding of these topics will assist you in setting up the return volley to the borrower from the co-lender side of the net; or at least help you quickly understand “where” the co-lender base line is located.

Nature of interest: what is the nature of the co-lender interest?

Here (attached PDF) is a short comparison of the typical differences between a participation structure (one note) and a syndication structure (multiple notes) (Note, however, that many of the typical differences between a participation and a syndication are addressed in the purchase/servicing agreement.)

  • "club" structure typically does not use a placement memo
  • “A” note and “B” note structure has some unique issues and are NOT covered by this brief listing

Key documents and “big picture” issues

  • sale\servicing agreement or intercreditor agreement
    • is servicing "rotated" or does servicing always remain in a specific co-lender?
    • this is one of the key documents; read it
  • loan documents: are co-lenders named on the note/security instrument?
  • what are the regulatory issues or balance sheet issues for each co-lender?

Funding by Co-lenders

  • one-step (to borrower closing) by all co-lenders
  • multi-step (borrower closing by originator lender; then separate, future fundings by co-lenders)
  • effect of failure to fund

Change in Lead\Servicer

  • default or insolvency
  • resignation (voluntary; involuntary)
  • removal rights?

If you have any comments, suggestions or additions to the foregoing, please post a comment.