Change: New Federal Foreclosure Law Gives Residential Tenants 90 Days to Vacate

(More from our "Watch for Change" series . . . .)

As you know, the "new" economy is prompting a wide range of new laws and ordinances, all of which present opportunities for the unwary to trip up and mess up in the collection process.

This posting will interest you if any of your collateral involves residential real property.

While this posting is written from a Texas perspective, the concept applies to all statesbecause the new Federal law applies to all states.

Thanks to Vince Marino of Winstead PC for this information, which was published in the Houston Business Journal on July 17, 2009.

If you have any questions or comments, please post them.

New Federal Foreclosure Law Gives Residential Tenants 90 Days to Vacate

In May 2009, President Barack Obama signed a new law called the “Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009,” the provisions of which were part of a much longer 72-page law known as the, “Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009.”
 
One part of this new federal law causes an important change in Texas local law on foreclosures and the rights of a tenant after a foreclosure.
 
Effective immediately (i.e. for foreclosures occurring after May 20, 2009) and relating to certain “federally related mortgage loans” and any loans on dwelling or residential real property, the purchaser at a foreclosure sale is required to provide a bona fide tenant at least 90 days’ notice before the tenant has to vacate. The new law is national in scope so tenants, no matter what state they live in, now have time to adjust their lives.
 
As a general rule, the new law requires any immediate successor-in-interest in property foreclosed upon to assume the property subject to the rights of a bona fide tenant under a bona fide lease until the end of the remaining term of the lease. There are exceptions to this general rule — such as the lease must be in existence as of the date of the notice of foreclosure, for example.
 
If a tenant is in possession of the property foreclosed upon without a lease or with a lease that is “terminable at will,” the purchaser at foreclosure merely has to give the occupant 90 days’ notice to vacate.
 
In all of the above instances, the foreclosing party can still evict a tenant who is not paying rent or is otherwise in default under his lease.
 
In Texas, if a mortgage was executed before the lease was executed, or if the lease was executed before the mortgage, and the lease contained a subordination provision making the lease subordinate and the mortgage superior in right, Texas law recognized that, after a foreclosure, such a tenant under such a lease would be a “tenant at will.”
 
Even with the new federal legislation, it would arguably appear that, under such circumstances, and based on the tenant being a tenant at will, a successful bidder at a Texas foreclosure would not have to honor the lease for the duration of its remaining term, but could instead terminate it with a 90-day notice to vacate.
 
Note that even under Texas law before this new federal legislation, if a home was purchased at a foreclosure sale under a lien superior to the tenant’s lease and the tenant paid rent on time and is not otherwise in default under the tenant’s lease after foreclosure, the purchaser was required to give the tenant at least 30 days written notice to vacate if the purchaser chose not to continue the lease. So, in this instance, the new federal law imposes a longer notice period in Texas.
 
Following a foreclosure, the new law says that if the tenant has no lease, he has to vacate within 90 days after receipt of a notice to vacate (which notice might be able to be given even before the foreclosure), or if there is a lease, a bona fide tenant can stay in possession for the remainder of the term pursuant to such tenant’s lease. But if the lease is “terminable at will” under state law, or if a purchaser from the successful bidder at foreclosure will occupy the property as his primary residence, the tenant must nevertheless vacate — but such tenant is entitled to receive a 90-day notice to vacate.
 
There is a provision in the statute that says nothing in the statute shall affect the requirements for termination of any federal or state-subsidized tenancy or of any state or local law that provides longer time periods or other additional protections for tenants.
 
The new foreclosure provisions only affect tenant-occupied properties that are being foreclosed upon and has no effect on mortgagor-occupied properties.
 
The new legislation represents a big change to the law in Texas. Where we previously had scattered state laws, now we have one national statute. The law sunsets on December 31, 2012.

Foreclosure and the Residential Tenant: Some Helpful Tips

As noted in our recent posting on this subject (The Very Dark Side), the Concurring Opinions Blog  addressed a volatile topic: evicting residential tenants after a real property foreclosure of a single-family residence.  In this posting, we suggest this topic has more relevance to commercial lenders and servicers than you might initially think; and we suggest some tips.

Clearly, most commercial mortgage lenders do not have this type of product (single-family) in the portfolio.  Or if they do, it is a million-dollar home occupied by an executive who is not a tenant, and definitely not a sympathetic figure in the new economy.

So, does a commercial mortgage lender or servicer care about this topic? Why should you care?

The prediction here is that the time will come when evicting a small business owner, or evicting families who occupy abandoned property (or a model home), or evicting laid-off workers occupying an abandoned warehouse or factory will gain the attention of the local media.

If this starts to sound like your portfolio, then here are a few tips:

  • Realize that foreclosure and the process of taking possession will be much different than your typical commercial collateral foreclosure. For starters, you should notify a broader group of people in the foreclosure process. For example, contact your community relations or governmental relations group, and include them in decisions made during the foreclosure process. In turn, they will reach out to local community organizations and governmental agencies.
     
  • As soon as you have the legal right to directly communicate with the occupant, contact them to discuss the process and options available to them, including local community and governmental resources. In other words, be a resource of information for the occupant.
     
  • Consider entering into a short-term lease arrangement (as a bridge to finding a replacement tenant) in order to give the occupant time to find new housing. (As to laid-off workers occupying the collateral - I'm still chewing on that one.)
     
  • If the collateral is an affordable housing project, examine the title records to verify rental and other restrictions that burden the project.

Taking back the collateral is tough enough. And getting it back while managing media coverage only makes it worse.

If you have any other suggestions or questions, please post a comment.
 

The Very Dark Side: Evicting tenants from foreclosed apartments

Evicting "unwanted" residential tenants is a tough, tough subject.  This piece by Mark Edwards at Concurring Opinions is worth reading.

There is a "human element" in these tough times, which Mark terms as the tension between legality and social responsibility.

It is a topic that is much discussed in workouts involving apartments. Indeed, it is the point where the lender (or servicer) shifts from viewing it as a "project collateral" (the lender perspective) and starts to understand it as an "apartment community" (the owner\investor perspective).

Often, we expand the workout team to include community relationship people, including governmental relationship people for the lender.

Please give us your questions, thoughts or suggestions on this subject by posting a comment.