Financial Reform: Major Industry Groups Ask Senate Banking Committee to Carefully Consider Securitization Reform
Once again [link to earlier letter], in a letter dated March 25, 2010, the 21 key industry groups band together in an attempt to focus the Senate on the importance of the securitization market, and to caution the Senate on the proposed reforms relating to the securitization market. The players in this group represent an extremely broad segment of the US economy:
- American Bankers Association
- American Hotel & Lodging Association
- American Resort Development Association
- American Securitization Forum
- Associated General Contractors of America
- Building Owners and Managers Association International
- Certified Commercial Investment Member Institute (CCIM Institute)
- Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (formerly CMSA)
- Community Mortgage Banking Project
- Institute of Real Estate Management
- International Council of Shopping Centers
- Loan Syndications and Trading Association
- Mortgage Bankers Association
- NAIOP, Commercial Real Estate Development Association
- National Apartment Association
- National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
- National Association of Real Estate Investment Managers
- National Association of Home Builders
- National Multi Housing Council
- The Real Estate Roundtable
- Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
The challenge is to keep the message, and the Senate’s focus, simple despite the expansive scope and length of the “Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010” – yet financial reform is a topic that invites amendments. (Recall the 473 amendments made on the bill in the Senate Banking Committee.)
The letter [download] addresses the importance of the securitization market as a key source of liquidity for economic recovery. The message is very simple and pointed:
- credit markets are constrained despite enormous demand for credit and significant loan maturities – all in the face of declining values
- new accounting changes will limit balance sheet capacity and the overall amount of credit
- the bill’s proposed “risk retention” terms will further limit balance sheet capacity and lending capacity
The letter states that “given the totality and far reaching implications of regulatory and accounting changes, there are serious concerns about the future viability of the securitization markets that are critical to borrower access to credit and an overall recovery.”
Perhaps because the letter is from a broad segment of the US economy, it does NOT address several important topics of importance to commercial real estate, such as -
- Covered bonds: note that on March 18, the House Financial Services Committee – Capital Markets Subcommittee (ranking members are Scott Garrett, R-NJ, Chairman Paul Kanjorski, D-PA, and Spencer Bachus, R-AL) introduced covered bond legislation. I’ll address this important bill in a future blog posting (For background on covered bonds: link)
- Rating agency reform: clearly this is a topic of key importance for securitizations involving commercial real estate (i.e., CMBS).
Regardless, it is good to see a broad spectrum of key industry groups join together is support of a specific, and focused, aspect of the reform legislation. The collective strength will be needed. It will be an up-hill battle.
If you have thoughts or comments, please post them below.